Organize where decisions are made

Contracts pass in city halls and county chambers — often quietly. Showing up, asking questions, and putting opposition on the record is how communities push back.

Join the Facebook group Coordinate meetings, share updates, and organize with neighbors.

Upcoming meetings

City councils and county commissions where ALPR contracts, renewals, and sheriff partnerships get decided. Dates below advance automatically from each body’s published cadence — always confirm time and public-comment rules on the official site before you go (holidays shift schedules).

Building live schedule…

Official link
Loading…

Click a column heading to sort. This list refreshes in your browser from the same auto-updating rules as the cards below. Confirm on the official site before you go.

Cities

Carrollton City Council

Public Safety Complex · 115 W Center St

Usually first Monday · 6 pm. 2026 holiday shift: Sep 14 instead of Sep 7.

City calendar →

Douglasville City Council

Conference Center · 6700 Church St

1st & 3rd Monday · 6 pm. 2026 exception: Sep 8 (Tuesday) instead of Sep 7.

2026 schedule (PDF) →

Villa Rica City Council

101 Main St

Regular meeting 2nd Tuesday · 6 pm. Work session 1st Tuesday · 10 am (not listed here).

City site →

Newnan City Council

City Hall · Richard A. Bolin Chambers

2nd Tuesday · 2:30 pm and 4th Tuesday · 6:30 pm.

2026 schedule (PDF) →

Counties

Carroll County Commission

Historic Courthouse · 323 Newnan St, 3rd floor

1st Tuesday · 6 pm.

County BOC →

Douglas County Commission

Douglas County Courthouse · Citizens Hall

Evening meetings: 1st Tuesday · 6 pm (none in July) and 3rd Tuesday · 6 pm. Legislative session also 1st Tuesday · 10 am.

County BOC →

Coweta County Commission

37 Perry St, 2nd floor · Newnan

1st & 3rd Tuesday · 6 pm (occasional exceptions — confirm on the agendas portal).

Agendas portal →

Haralson County Commission

155 Van Wert St · Buchanan

Regular meeting 1st Tuesday · 6 pm. Work session 3rd Tuesday · 6 pm (not listed here).

County BOC →

Paulding County Commission

Dallas, GA

Usually 2nd & 4th Tuesdays (work session earlier; board meeting often 2 pm or 6 pm). Confirm time on the county calendar.

County calendar →

Heard County Commission

Admin Building · 201 Park Ave, Franklin

3rd Tuesday · 6 pm.

County BOC →

Auto-updating calendar. Next dates are calculated in your browser from each government’s published pattern (plus known 2026 holiday exceptions). Cadence verified July 2026 against official calendars/PDFs.

If a listing looks wrong, trust the government’s site and tell us in the Facebook group so we can update the rules.

Before the meeting

  1. Find the contract Search your government site for “Flock,” “ALPR,” or “license plate reader.” Check past agendas — deals often land on the consent agenda.
  2. File a records request Ask for contracts, retention policies, data-sharing agreements, search logs, and access rules. In Georgia, use the Open Records Act.
  3. Map cameras near you Report locations at deflock.me. Knowing the footprint strengthens testimony.
  4. Confirm public comment rules Signup cards, time limits, and speaker order vary by city. Arrive early.

Prepare for public comment

Most meetings allow about three minutes. You do not need to be an expert. Bring facts, one specific ask, and a calm tone.

Lead with governance, not opposition. “I support effective policing; my concern is vendor oversight and community consent.”

  • Print a one-page handout for each member
  • Arrive 20–30 minutes early to sign up
  • State your name and that you are a constituent
  • Cite one concrete concern and one concrete ask
  • Pair claims with verifiable sources when you can

Sample 3-minute talk track

Adapt to your city or county. This example addresses a county commission; swap in your board, local agencies, and details as needed. Replace the bracketed fields with your own information. Tone: factual and constitutional — not anti-police.

“Good evening, Commissioners. My name is [your name], and I reside in [your town], Georgia, in [your] County. Thank you for the opportunity to address the Board this evening.

I urge the Board to examine and reconsider the deployment of Flock Safety automated license plate readers and similar mass surveillance systems in [your] County. These tools create a digital dragnet that tracks every vehicle passing through the county, compiling detailed records of movements without individualized suspicion or a warrant. This practice raises profound concerns under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

The Supreme Court in Carpenter v. United States (2018) held that accessing long-term location data revealing the “whole of one’s physical movements” constitutes a search requiring a warrant. The Court recognized that even data from public movements, when aggregated over time, provides an intimate window into private life — visits to doctors, places of worship, family, or political activities — that society expects to remain private. A network of Flock cameras functions similarly: each plate read logs time, location, and vehicle details, allowing reconstruction of travel patterns across days or weeks. With cameras already in place through the Sheriff’s Office and local police, residents can be tracked routinely as they go about daily life in our community.

While some lower courts have distinguished short-term or limited ALPR use from Carpenter, the logic applies directly here as networks expand and data is stored, searched, and shared. Persistent surveillance of this nature chills the freedom of movement the Fourth Amendment safeguards. Recent geofence-warrant rulings further underscore that dragnet location tracking without proper safeguards infringes constitutional rights.

[Your] County can maintain strong public safety through targeted, constitutional methods that respect privacy. I ask the Board to review and end contracts with these surveillance companies, impose strict limits on data retention and sharing, enhance transparency, and halt further expansion until safeguards ensure compliance with the Fourth Amendment.

Thank you for your service and consideration. I’m available for any questions or to share resources.”

Governance asks

Boards that vote yes on cameras without rules are buying liability. Ask for public safety and constitutional control — not a blank vendor contract.

Primary ask — vote this first

  1. Review and end (or non-renew) Flock and similar ALPR contracts Your 3-minute talk leads here for a reason: once the grid is up, abuse and mission creep get cheaper every year. Dozens of U.S. cities have already cancelled or constrained these deals after public scrutiny.
  2. Freeze new cameras, renewals, and feature upgrades until written policy exists No expansion on the consent agenda. No “temporary” pilots that become permanent. Pause until the governing body — city council or county commission — has debated retention, sharing, audits, and Fourth Amendment risk in public.

If they keep the system — non-negotiable safeguards

If the Board will not cancel tonight, do not leave without these minimums. Pair every concern with a recorded vote.

  1. Adopt a written ALPR / plate-reader policy by ordinance Georgia has no statewide ALPR statute. Without a local ordinance, the vendor’s terms and a police login screen become the only “policy.” Put rules in law the public can read.
  2. Cap data retention at no more than 30 days by ordinance — shorter is better Vendor “30-day” marketing is often a dashboard setting that can stretch far longer. Carpenter-style pattern-of-life risk grows with every day of storage. Cap it in ordinance, not a vendor checkbox.
  3. Default: no sharing beyond the local agency; no National Lookup; no standing federal access Require a recorded governing-body vote for any exception. Ban side-door lookups for ICE or other agencies without a warrant. Local cameras should not quietly feed a nationwide dragnet.
  4. Require a warrant (or documented active felony case) for historical / pattern-of-life searches Aligns with the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Carpenter v. United States (2018): long-term location history is not a casual “investigation” field. Vague search reasons like “investigation” enable stalking and fishing expeditions.
  5. Ban audio / voice detection and AI person-search features in the public right-of-way Platforms expand by software update — gunshot mics that listen for voices, description-based person search, more sensors. Ban the capability before it arrives as a silent upgrade.
  6. Independent security assessment before any renewal or expansion — results public Confirmed CVEs, weak authentication, and cameras compromised in seconds are documented. Taxpayers should not underwrite unaudited cloud surveillance.
  7. No vendor setting changes without written authorization from the governing body or its designee Mountain View’s nationwide sharing was enabled without the department’s knowledge. If the vendor can flip a switch, the Board never truly controlled the system.
  8. Quarterly public audit reports and a transparency portal Publish search counts, stated reasons, outside agencies, hit/false-hit rates, and sharing logs. Internal “audits” the public cannot see are not oversight.
  9. No new features without a recorded governing-body vote; review the full contract before renewal Lock the scope to what was sold. Renegotiate or reject terms that grant perpetual vendor licenses, unilateral policy changes, or open-ended data use.

If you are challenged

Don’t you want to catch criminals?
Yes. Effective tools need accountability. If the system works, it survives an audit and written controls.
The police say they need this.
I’m not questioning officers’ intentions. I’m questioning the vendor’s track record and whether this city has governance before expanding.
Officers only see plate images.
That may be true today. The platform supports AI person search and audio detection. Software updates add capability without new hardware or hearings.
That’s conspiracy thinking.
Every point can be verified — audits, court filings, vulnerability databases, or the vendor’s own documents.

After the meeting

  1. Follow up in writing Email members the same asks and sources you used at the mic.
  2. Bring a neighbor next time Five speakers is a comment period. Twenty-five is hard to ignore.
  3. Keep mapping Update deflock.me so the community map stays accurate.
  4. Connect Join the DeFlock West Georgia Facebook group to coordinate with neighbors. Also use deflock.org/council and DeFlock Atlanta.